Home

Kommentieren Ausgelassen Verwaltung shoe branding europe bvba v adidas and ohim Magenschmerzen Teller Aussterben

CURIA - Documents
CURIA - Documents

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG
Shoe Branding Europe BVBA v. Adidas AG

The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel  Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness  – SCRIPTed
The General Court of the EU Confirms that Adidas' “Three Parallel Equidistant Stripes” EU Figurative Trade Mark is Devoid of Distinctiveness – SCRIPTed

Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas  renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos
Adidas AG vs Shoe Branding Europe, o la protección de las marcas renombradas y notorias - Enrique Ortega Burgos

adidas Loses Three Stripes Trademark Battle in EU Court | Hypebeast
adidas Loses Three Stripes Trademark Battle in EU Court | Hypebeast

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Welcome
Welcome

Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than  Stripes – Infusion Lawyers
Adidas v Shoe Branding—Why Adidas's Three-stripe Mark Means More than Stripes – Infusion Lawyers

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History
Shoe Branding Europe V. Adidas: Case History

Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe  Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv
Predmet T-145/14: Tužba podnesena 3. ožujka 2014. – adidas protiv OHIM-a – Shoe Branding Europe protiv OHIM-a (Amblem s dv

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA  against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh
Case C-396/15 P: Appeal brought on 21 July 2015 by Shoe Branding Europe BVBA against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh

adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel  stripes placed on the side of sports shoes
adidas may oppose the registration, as a Community mark, of parallel stripes placed on the side of sports shoes

Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the  Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR  Developments
Adidas & Coca Cola: Two decisions of the EU courts dealing with the Community trade mark | TTLF Newsletter on Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe  case - The IPKat
Of stripes, positions, and shoes: CJEU's decision in Adidas three-stripe case - The IPKat

The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes  trademark: Dennemeyer
The General Court of EU confirms the invalidity of Adidas three-stripes trademark: Dennemeyer

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs  OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case  T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky
Quirijn Meijnen advocaat: Leopold Meijnen Oosterbaan advocaten: Adidas A.G. vs OHIM and Shoe Branding Europe BVBA Decision General Court 21 May 2015 Case T‑145/14, three stripes and third time lucky

TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.:  303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA
TRADE MARKS ORDINANCE (Cap. 559) OPPOSITION TO TRADE MARK APPLICATION NO.: 303083788 MARK: CLASSES: 30, 31, 32 and 35 APPLICA

Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual  property | The Guardian
Adidas loses three-stripe trademark battle in European court | Intellectual property | The Guardian